Part 8 – Contact, Crash Retrievals, Accounts
Part 9 – Articles of Interest – Documents
Spaceship Moon
- J.B. Deutscher March, 2026
“It’s not that you are not looking at it.
It is the way you are looking at it.
And, the way that you are looking at it is wrong.
It is not a theory. It is a fact that the ‘Moon’ of our Earth/Moon binary planetary system is an artificial satellite. The lunar surface is the remnants of the outer layer of an enormous, patched up spacecraft far older than our star system with the remains of surface constructions of various eras and scale, some vestiges almost incomprehensible in size to the earthly human perspective. It is a fact that its artificiality had been strongly suspected by top American, Russian, and other scientists for over 60-70 years, alluded to for at least 100 years, mentioned as far back as in ancient Greek literature and Sumerian text and confirmed through scientific evidence gathered during the Apollo era over 50 years ago.
That finding was never disseminated to the public and is suppressed to this day. It is a fact that this contemporary revelation was generated by the shared, coordinated efforts of the American and Soviet space programs. It is a fact that innumerable incidences of activity of a non-natural nature on and about the lunar surface have been observed since the invention of the telescope. It is a fact that Apollo astronauts were accompanied both to and from the moon on every mission by extraterrestrial craft which is supported by multiple sources within and without NASA. And, It is a fact that UFOs and the Moon are inextricably intertwined.
Northwestern astronomer and USAF consultant on UFOs Dr. J. Allen Hynek in a statement made in a 1967 interview went about as far as he could publicly, “…any theory of the UFOs will have to explain their abundance. To our earth-bound minds, one or two Apollo missions per year is something we can understand; two or three Apollo missions per day would be quite another thing! Consider too that the nearest star to us is more than one hundred million times farther than the moon- well. I hardly need explain further.”
As presented in previous sections, it is a publicly available, photographically documented fact that Apollo astronauts on Missions 16 and 17 were being accompanied, guided, or chaperoned by extraterrestrials at times on the lunar surface (As was shown in Parts 3 and 4) and it might be assumed all other missions as well were at least under surveillance by the likely indigenous residents; our lunar neighbors.
It is a fact that most peoples, especially the American people have been continuously lied to and misled about these revelations by criminal, compartmentalized units within the US military and intelligence apparatus assisted knowingly or unknowingly by their media puppets in contravention of the Space Act of 1958; likely answerable only to an inner sanctum of international scientists to whom the task of overseeing and controlling the release of space findings has been ceded. This claim is buttressed by multiple sources.
To help absorb what I am claiming consider the following quotation from the psychopath who ran Counter-Intelligence for The CIA throughout the early space program:
“Deception is a state of mind and the mind of the State.”
~ James Jesus Angleton, head of CIA counter intelligence from 1954-1974
In 1969 prior to the Apollo 11 launch, the preeminent U.S. astronomer and Nobel recipient, Dr. Harold Urey publicly advised geologists who would be studying the lunar samples and data to – “Let your imaginations run free.”
Bertrand Russel (the High Priest of Science for the Ruling Oligarchy) wrote an article published in the London Times which appeared the day before the launch of Apollo 11 entitled – “Why Man Should Keep Away from the Moon.”
One of Russel’s stated reasons for keeping away was – The Cultural Impact: The Moon landing could lead to a sense of disillusionment with earthly life and values. Russel was merely condensing the Brooking’s Report central rationalization for censorship which became publicly available in March 1961 when NASA had presented the study to Congress as was discussed in detail in Part 2 of this website. And, one can reasonably assume that Bertrand Russel was part of the above-mentioned Inner Sanctum.
The original New York Times article dated December 15, 1960 titled Mankind Is Warned to Prepare For Discovery of Life in Space is imaged below along with the Brookings report cover page. The article begins- “Discovery of life on other worlds could cause Earth’s civilization to collapse, a federal report said today.” This is not exactly a statement to be laughed off.
The report verifies nine years before Apollo astronauts set foot on the Moon elements of the U.S. military and government already knew the Moon as well as our star system was inhabited by advanced civilizations and through Brookings (whose findings and recommendations were rigged) had provided the mechanism to blindside and bamboozle the public.
If the lunar samples had been composed of just rocks and dust as we were told and nothing artificial had been discovered, not to mention ongoing extraterrestrial activities, there would be no need for the warning. Of course, it wasn’t just rocks and dust and, all these people, these officials, these NASA experts were playing us, lying their asses off. They had seen the real pictures and knew what was there. The publicly available pre-Apollo probe imagery had been censored through alteration just like the entire Apollo photo data set would later be.
On November 24, 1966 a landmark close-up photo of the brightest spot on the observable side of the Moon, the crater Copernicus, was imaged by Lunar Orbiter 2 giving an oblique view from approximately 150 miles due south at an altitude of 28 miles. Instead of likely shocking the world with massive artificial structures within the crater as should have also been seen from the Mission 15 and 17 Apollo landing sites, the Photo of the Century the public was shown was a censored, somewhat earth-like landscape, a relative nothingburger
As examples of publicly announced discoveries which flew under the radar, the Soviet probe Luna 9 returned images on February 4, 1966 showing two straight lines of identical equidistantly spaced stones in the shape of elongated pyramids positioned at an angle to produce strong reflectivity from the sun. A stereoscopic view had been obtained by chance as the result of the lander settling or repositioning between images allowing for the measurements to be taken. The objects were estimated in the range of 15 stories in height. The Soviet publication Technology of Youth had covered the story saying that they were definitely artificial.
Photos taken starting in November of 1966 again by Lunar Orbiter 2 from a distance of 23 miles show a series of enormous stones (likely monuments) on the western edge of the Sea of Tranquility. The shadows of eight of these gigantic objects which are at least 50 feet in diameter and range from 40-70 feet long, stretch for great distances. One is over 600 feet high casting a shadow resembling that of the Washington Monument. As reported at that time by the Soviet magazine Interavai. Named the Blair Cuspids after Dr. William Blair of the Boeing Institute of Biotechnology who stated that the objects were geometrically positioned pyramidal spires with a vast rectangular depression west of the tallest spire.
The question should be asked- Is the Washington Monument somehow connected?
Luna 9 had imaged similar objects in February of 1966 located in The Ocean of Storms as reported in the Soviet magazine, Technology of Youth interpreting them as planned structures of alien origin in the 150-foot height range. Referring to them as “pointed pyramids.”
Very importantly, Dr. Farouk El Baz, (during that period) one of NASA’s leading consulting geologists from BellCom commented on the strange spires:
“There have been quite a few unexplainable objects, but most interesting are these tremendously long shadows cast by enormous spires seen almost everywhere on the moon. These objects become very dramatic anomalies to us— huge, huge shadows that stretched for miles and thinned out like needles at their points. Some of these objects are only a hundred yards high, others are taller than the tallest buildings on Earth—often two and three times taller. They’re much lighter in color than the surrounding mare or lava fields, which gives them an additional aura of mystery. They seem to have been constructed of different material.”
When asked of their origins El Baz deflects. (Note that El Baz uses the term “constructed.”) Left is the previously presented undocumented image clumsily blurring out shapes which fit the spire descriptions.
By Lunar Orbiter 6 in 1967 before the Americans ever set foot on the Moon NASA already had high-resolution images of structures, equipment, active mining operations, large pictographs in the marias (more sophisticated than anything seen in the Nasca plateau), and immense ruins all over the lunar surface. Most of this would have all been glaringly obvious to anyone viewing the real images. Instead, the American public and the world were shown mostly low resolution, or out of focus, airbrushed, doctored, fraudulent photographic garbage.
Eyewitness testimony from one individual viewing uncensored Lunar images at a NASA Library hidden underground at the Johnson Space Center is as follows:
“To this day, I can remember these views: A boulder that seemed to have been rolled uphill, leaving its tracks in the side of the hill;
obvious machinery on the surface, showing bolted sections; three dilapidated “bridges” crossing a chasm that reminded me of the Grand
Canyon; pipe fittings that looked like four-way Ts (or Xs) that could be seen in every photo, some with their ends turned up or down as they
hung over the edge of a crater; three surprising pyramids that prompted me later to closely study the Egyptian Giza pyramid complex;
apparent pipelines criss-crossing the surface, running to and from craters; a UFO rising from the surface and photographed directly above
a crater; and perhaps the most memorable, the unmistakable figure of a rectangular structure placed squarely in the biggest crater pictured-
the structure looked either very old or under construction, but the crater had to be miles wide, and the camera angle gave a perfect
three-dimensional view.
The clarity and resolution were unlike that of anything I had seen
before or since...”
(For a further description of what the real orbital imagery looked like see The Vito Sacherri account here.)
In July 1970 the Soviet publication Sputnik printed an article written by two high level Soviet scientists, Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov entitled – IS THE MOON THE CREATION OF INTELLIGENCE?
It begins:
AN ARTIFICIAL SPUTNIK OF THE EARTH?
The origin of the Moon is one of the most complicated problems of cosmogony. So far there have been basically three hypotheses under discussion.
HYPOTHESIS I. The Moon was once a part of the Earth and broke away from it. This has now been refuted by the evidence.
HYPOTHESIS II. The Moon was formed independently from the same cloud of dust and gas as the Earth, and immediately became the Earth’s natural satellite… [Rejected due to dissimilar composition and characteristics.]
HYPOTHESIS III. The Moon came into being separately, and, moreover, far from the Earth (perhaps even outside the Solar system).
This would mean that the moon would not have to be fashioned from the same “clay” as our own planet. Sailing through the Universe, the Moon came into Earth’s proximity, and by a complex interplay of forces of gravity was brought within a geocentric orbit, very close to circular. But a catch of this kind is virtually impossible
In fact, scientists studying the origin of the Universe today have no acceptable theory to explain how the Earth-Moon system came into being
OUR HYPOTHESIS: The Moon is an artificial Earth satellite put into orbit around the Earth by some intelligent beings unknown to ourselves…”
“… It is more likely that what we have here is a very ancient spaceship…this “caravel” of the Universe” to serve as a kind of Noah’s Ark of intelligence, perhaps even as the home of a whole civilisation envisaging a prolonged (thousands of millions of years) existence and long wanderings through space (thousands of millions of miles)…the hull of such a spaceship must be super-tough in order to stand up to the blows of meteorites and sharp fluctuations between extreme heat and extreme cold.
Probably the shell is a double-layered affair–the basis a dense armouring of about 20 miles in thickness, and outside it some kind of more loosely packed covering (a thinner layer–averaging about three miles). In certain areas–where the lunar “seas” and “craters” are, the upper layer is quite thin, in some cases, non-existent…Thus the distance between the kernel and the shell of this nut is in the region of 30 miles….” [Emphasis added]
Vasin and Shcherbakov, quoting the work of Soviet physicist Kirill Stanyukovich, “… a “missile” of a sizable character (say 6 miles in diameter) must, on collision with the Moon, penetrate to a depth equal to 4 or 5 times its own diameter (24-30 miles). The surprising thing is that however big the meteorites may have been which have fallen on the Moon (some have been more than 60 miles in diameter), and however fast they must have been traveling (in some cases the combined speed was as much as 38 miles per second), the craters they have left behind are for some odd reason all about the same depth, 1.2-2 miles, although they vary tremendously in diameter.
Take that 148-mile diameter…one would expect to find a very deep crater here, but nothing of the sort: there is three miles at the most between top and bottom levels, and one third of that is accounted for by the wall of rock thrown up around the crater like a toothed crown…it is too shallow…Furthermore, the bottom of the crater is convex, following the curve of the lunar surface. If you were to stand in the middle of the crater you would not even be able to see the soaring edge–it would be beyond the horizon…when the meteorite strikes the outer covering of the moon, this plays the role of a buffer and the foreign body finds itself up against an impenetrable spherical barrier. Only slightly denting the 20-mile layer of armour plating…the Moon’s defence coating is, according to our calculations, 2.5 miles thick, one sees that this is approximately the maximum depth of the craters…”
The article encapsulated above which was under 5 pages in length laid out their theory that the Moon is actually a planetoid of great age which was essentially hollowed out and converted into a spacecraft perhaps as far back as 2 billion years ago by a long-gone advanced race. They call it “an inside out world.” Vasin and Shcherbakov speculate based upon then available rock and lunar regolith(soil) analysis dating surface material in the 5-billion-year range; older than our solar system. * After 1970 far older dated samples would come to light. Where Vasin and Shcherbakov intentionally mislead the public is by representing that the Moon is a long abandoned, lifeless world which conforms to agreed upon restrictions to prevent social disruption.
The complete original text as presented in Sputnik can be found here.
Vasin and Shcherbakov were not alone in questioning the true nature of the Moon in 1970; nor were they the first. As early as 1954 the head of the Lunar Section of the British Astronomical Society, H.P. Wilkins in his1954 book Our Moon titled Chapter 13– Is the Moon Hollow? Wilkins states – “Everything points to a more or less hollow nature of the crust of the Moon within some 20 or 30 miles of the surface.” This is a near identical assessment the Soviet scientists would give 16 years later.
Author George Leonard (Somebody Else is on the Moon – published in 1976) says scientists on this side of the Iron Curtain are also arriving at the same conclusion. -that our Moon is a spaceship. Leonard says that a former NASA scientist related that he “heard it [the spaceship theory of the Moon] explained by an engineer at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and by a British Physicist at Oxford. The theory is that the Moon is a vast spaceship, that was driven to our solar system many thousands of years ago after suffering a terrible calamity in space. Its occupants have been engaged in a long, slow effort to repair the damage. Machinery is seen in several places on the Moon. It is nuclear powered and will one day be used to drive the Moon out of our orbit into space again.”
In 1959 Iosif S. Shklovosky, an internationally known top Soviet astrophysicist of that period concluded that the Martian moons, Phobos and Deimos were hollow and therefore artificial satellites. Shklovsky would later back down (publicly at least) from his theory purportedly due to updated data. I don’t think for a minute that an astrophysicist of Shklovsky’s stature would make such an error. And, as has been seen time and again those who contradict prevailing dogma are either pressured to retract their opinions or are discredited as was the case with Morris K. Jessup who taught astronomy and mathematics at Drake University and the University of Michigan. Jessup erected and operated the largest refractory telescope in the southern hemisphere for the University of Michigan discovering numerous double stars. In his books- The Case for the UFO and The Expanding Case for the UFO Jessup details the evidence that the UFOs are real and that three and one half centuries have documented that they have been on the Moon.
Early images released by NASA which I viewed suggested an artificial construct or cross shaped monument on the surface of Phobos but the poor image clarity was consistent with NASA being up to their old tricks. This suspected artificial feature was fairly common knowledge. Years later in an interview former Apollo astronaut, Buzz Aldrin would bring up the “anomaly” on the Phobos surface confidently suggesting that it was indeed artificial. Two points here being – A hollow Moon or converted planetoid is not unusual in our star system. And, Buzz Aldrin likely had seen the real images of Phobos in NASA’s possession.
Further Historical Support – Bishop John Wilkins chaired the founding meeting of the Royal Society and was its first secretary. He was the only person to have been head of a college in both Cambridge and Oxford
“In 1644 an English Bishop, John Wilkins (Brother-in-law to Oliver Cromwell) versed in ancient classics wrote a book entitled Discovery of a New World in which he insisted there was a world of living beings inside our Moon. He arrived at this conclusion from innumerable references in ancient works. As a scholar of these mostly Greek and Latin works he had come across references time and time again to the fact that our Moon was a hollow, inhabited world.” – Attribution -Wilson (And that below)
Orpheus the Greek god of wisdom and father of the Greek culture tells us “That it hath many mountains, and cities, and houses within it…”
Aristotle tells us in his Constitution of Tagean that the barbarous Pelasgians, aborigines who inhabited Arcadia before the coming of the Greeks, held chief title to the land there from the first by the very fact that they were “already living on it before there was a moon in the heavens.”
“…Because of this the early Greeks called them Proselenes, meaning before Selene or before the Moon. Selene is the Greek goddess of the Moon and the name is often applied to the Moon itself. Plutarch wrote in The Roman Question: “These were Arcadians of Evanders’ following, the so-called Pre-Lunar people.” Similarly Ovid wrote:
“The Arcadians are said to have possessed their land before the birth of Jove, and that folk is older than the Moon.”
“Still other ancient writers allude to a time when there was no Moon in the sky above the Earth. Apollonius Rhodius mentions the time “when not all orbs were yet in the heavens, [Emphasis added] before the Danai and Deukalion races came into existence, and only the Arcadians lived, of whom it is said that they dwelt on the mountains and fed on acorns, before there was a moon.” Similarly, the Roman writer Censorinus refers to the time eons before him when there was no Moon in the Earth’s skies.”
Immanuel Velikovsky points out in – The Earth Without a Moon the ancient Assyrians “referred to the time of the Moon god as the oldest period in the memory of the people: before other planetary gods came to dominate the world ages, the Moon was the Supreme Deity.”
He also observes such references are found in the inscriptions of Sargon II – “Since the faroff days of the Moon-god’s time.” And, the scattered references in the Bible “to the time before there was a moon.” Similarly, in Psalms 72:5 it is written: “Thou was feared since [the time of] the sun and before [the time of] the moon, a generation of generations.
Of course, Velikovsky is dismissed as pseudoscience by the likes of parochial science (that is too grudging, and rigged to concede that Velikovsky could have been even partially correct) and disparaged by deceitful CIA disinfo fronts like Wiki-Pedia.
Apollo is one of the most important and complex of the Olympian deities in classical Greek and Roman religion as well as their mythology. Apollo is considered to be the most Greek of all the gods. Top NASA personnel, their scientists, and the international scientific overseers were well aware of the ancient Greek lunar interaction to terrestrial history. That NASA named its Moon program Apollo makes this glaringly obvious. To put it bluntly, the gods of ancient Greek myth were likely technologically advanced humanlike beings interacting with and manipulating terrestrial culture originating and based from the Moon.
In America’s Race for the Moon, subtitled, Story of Project Apollo edited by Walter Sullivan (Random House, 1962) refers to a study by Dr. Gordon McDonald of an analysis of the Moon’s motions. The study concluded- “If astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the Moon be less dense than the outer parts. Indeed, it would seem that the Moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.” (Astronautics, February 1962, p.225) McDonald purportedly could not accept the validity of his own conclusion believing something was wrong with the data or his calculations. At least that was what he stated publicly. Putting forth such opinions was a fast track to career self-destruction.
A study of moon’s gravitational fields by Dr. Sean C. Solomon of MIT also indicated the Moon could be hollow as presented in Volume 6 of The Moon, An International Journal of Lunar Studies: “The Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the Moon’s gravitational field…indicating the frightening possibility that the Moon might be hollow.” [Emphasis added]
The fact was that the translational studies of the moon’s motions indicated that its greatest mass was concentrated near-surface; information readily understandable to any scientist trained in the field of Celestial Mechanics.
One of the primary investigations conducted by NASA during the Apollo missions was to assess the lunar subsurface and secretly the interior. Three main high sensitivity seismic monitoring stations with Earth transmitters were set up on the surface. By 1970, just as the Soviets, NASA clearly already knew the Moon was cavernous or hollow and wanted detailed information of the lunar interior’s infrastructure. NASA consulting geologist from BellCom, Dr. Farouk El Baz claims that NASA suspected hollows did indeed exist within the Moon and admits that our government ordered and carried out certain experiments on the Moon to determine if they did. He claims that such experiments that were not publicly announced were held in the strictest secrecy. (Saga, March 1974 p.36) [Emphasis added]
At first NASA steered booster stages to crash on the surface and in one case the ascent stage of the LEM to generate the seismic waves. This proving inadequate, a proposal to remotely detonate an atomic bomb on the far side to send shock waves through the lunar interior was submitted by NASA’s Chief Seismologist, Dr. Gary Latham.
Cover stories promoting this approach by an American and later a Soviet general were put forth explaining exploding a nuke on the lunar surface as a demonstration of military power and that the explosion would be visible from Earth. The proposal was purportedly withdrawn. Of course it was all a ruse.
Unbeknownst to the public, on April 11, 1970 Apollo 13 was launched carrying a nuclear warhead to be remotely detonated on the lunar surface just as Dr. Gary Latham had proposed. Two days into the mission NASA reported a never adequately explained oxygen tank explosion in the Command and Service Module aborting the mission. Mission 13 continued to the Moon, then hobbled back to Earth without ever landing a crew on the surface. Of course, if you want to be fed some real B.S. just watch the 1995 NASA/CIA/Hollywood concocted version of these events starring Tom Hanks, Kevin Bacon, and Bill Paxton entitled Apollo 13. The movie version is what the public was misled to understand. There were people inside the Apollo program that had access to an entirely different account of what really happened
Maurice Chatelain, states in his 1979 book, Our Ancestors Came From Outer Space:
“There was even some talk that the Apollo 13 mission carried a nuclear device aboard that could be set off to make measurements of the infrastructure of the moon and whose detonations would show on the charts of several recording seismographs placed in different locations. The unexplained explosion of an oxygen tank in the service module of Apollo 13 on its flight to the moon, according to rumors, was caused deliberately by a UFO that was following the capsule to prevent the detonation of the atomic charge that could possibly have destroyed or endangered some moon base established by the extraterrestrials. Well, there was a lot of talk and there still is.” Maurice Chatelain was former Senior Electrical Engineer at North American Aviation who oversaw the design, construction, and ran the Apollo communications network.
Additionally, “It seems that all Apollo and Gemini flights were followed, both at a distance and sometimes also quite closely, by space vehicles of extraterrestrial origin- flying saucers, or UFOs (unidentified flying objects), if you want to call them by that name. Every time it occurred, the astronauts informed Mission Control, who then ordered absolute silence.” ~ Maurice Chatelain
In 1995 an interesting report came out in an interview with a former technical illustrator who was employed by a NASA contractor for 15 years in Building #8 at the Johnson Space Center. Her name was Donna Tiezte. According to Tietze she had dated a man who had been in the security detail for the astronauts when they had come back from the moon. Tietze was told by her friend (referring to Apollo 13) “…that it shouldn’t have come back… He said it was impossible for that craft to have gotten back home.” She was told that they had had help.
The man also told Tietze, “…that every astronaut, every moon trip had been followed by craft, by saucers, that every one of them, every astronaut that went to the moon… they all had seen it, and all had been told to keep quiet about it, and they were threatened with jail and their whole retirement, everything taken away from them… This man told me that if I ever told that he said it, that he would deny it, that he would never admit that he told me all of that.”
Fortuitously, or something quite deliberate occurred just two years after the Apollo 13 fiasco. In an estimated one in a million-year event, a large meteor impacted the Moon on May 13,1972 with a force of about 200 tons of TNT. The impact generated enough seismic data enabling scientists to determine the thickness of the Moon’s outer crust being about 36 miles or about twice as thick as Earth’s. “It was a miracle of the first magnitude,” exclaimed Dr. Latham, chief seismological researcher of Columbia University Geological Observatory and NASA’s chief seismologist. (Science News, July 1, 1972.)
What geologists generally concluded was that lunar subsurface material (Excluding Maria areas) increased in density with depth. The surface materials had a strong insulative value and contained extreme high refractory metal content including, titanium, zirconium, and other super tough, high melt point metals. Sound transmission traveled through the lower depths consistent with the speed at which sound travels through metal. Surface material in the Marias was found to contain extremely high proportions of titanium, iron, or a combination of both with a melt point of around 4000 degrees Fahrenheit.
Other oddities included the discovery of pure iron particles that did not rust which are not known to occur in nature and additionally, iron particles that contained rust which should not have been found on a supposed dead orb devoid of water or oxygen.
“Titanium rocks with ten times the titanium of the most titanium rich rocks ever found on earth… but not only titanium was found in these lunar samples, but also zirconium, yttrium, beryllium, and similar rare, anti-corrosive, temperature resistant metallic elements in perplexingly high percentages. These are among the most durable substances known to man and have admirable heat-resistant qualities, requiring extremely high temperatures to melt. Yet lunar sample samples indicate they are present in shockingly great abundance in the lunar outer crust. In fact, one scientific journal (Science News, August 16, 1969) states that the outer surface of the Moon seems to contain titanium, yttrium, and zirconium in “amounts higher than present estimates in either in earthly rock or estimates of elemental abundance in the Universe.”
The pure iron particles were reported by General Electric Research Center subsequently verified by University of California Berkeley as reported in the NYT January 7, 1970. Soviet Zond probes (16-20) reported the same. The Soviets reported pure iron samples that did not rust were recovered from the Sea of Crisis in 1976.
“The amount of refractory elements in the surface rocks is so pronounced that several geochemists proposed these materials were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some way. In such a theory the highly volatile materials would be concentrated toward the interior. In fact, the Moon is so strange in this respect that Dr. D. L. Anderson, professor of geophysics and director of the seismological laboratory at Caltech proposes that – “The Moon was made inside out.”
As the Spaceship theory goes the approximate two-mile depth of surface regolith and broken rock were created by dumping the excavated materials from the interior. However, that theory alone does not explain the sophisticated utility of its composition indicating it was processed in some highly advanced manner before placement.
Additionally, evidence of high technological processes is supported by an anonymous report which I reviewed. (circa 1996) It was given by a terminally-ill former government scientist who had been involved in examining lunar regolith samples during Apollo. He stated that using Electron Scanning Microscopes (ESMs) his research team had studied nanotechnology in the lunar samples.
“The outer layer seems to be rubble Gary Latham, chief seismological researcher of Columbia University Geological Observatory, points out: The evidence seems to indicate a broken up, rubble structure in the outer 10 or 20 miles… We are not able to say how this structure came into being.”
As discussed by Vasin and Shcherbakov the lunar crater depths never exceed the ‘buffer” or “defence coating” to about 2 miles below the surface, with the lunar curvature in the larger craters still intact and undistorted no matter the impactor or crater diameter demonstrating a near uniform depth of refusal thereby identifying the outer membrane of the spaceship hull or what they call “The armour shell.” Whether the hull is partially or entirely composed of engineered metallic composite rock materials or it transitions to a solid titanium alloy at lower depths as per one of NASA’s own models is of a lesser matter. The facts indicate that this protective inner shell did not occur naturally but is a purposeful, materially sophisticated, artificial construct. The outer two-mile buffering layer (excluding Marias) consists of a mixture of highly insulative materials and the surface soils (regolith) mixed in with rock of dissimilar age.
Vasin and Shcherbakov’s model assessed the lunar Marias (which occur in only one quadrant of the near surface) as areas the spaceship hull that was damaged in the distant past. To repair the damage the residents refined a kind of resilient, metalized cement from the interior and pumped vast amounts of the molten material to the surface from far below to patch the damage producing the extremely flat expanses. The Maria materials are about 20% denser than samples taken from other surface areas and have a melt point of approximately 4000 degrees. They observed that mass concentrations were detected in the center of every Maria so substantial it altered the gravitational effects on the orbiting space capsules. They believed that these mass concentrations were likely created by the enormous equipment used to do the repairs still below the surface that were left in place.
“It’s too far out to be a true satellite of the Earth. It’s too big to have been captured by Earth. The chances of such a capture having been affected and the Moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible.” ~ Isaac Asimov American writer and professor of biochemistry at Boston University. (Asimov On Astronomy, Doubleday 1974.)
Asimov concludes that our Moon is not as is commonly believed, the true satellite of our planet. He claims that if it were “it would almost certainly be orbiting in the plane of the Earth’s equator and it isn’t.” He claims the Moon should not be orbiting our planet because of what he calls “the tug of war” ratio. “The Sun attracts the Moon twice as strongly as the Earth does.” This ratio of the Moon’s size and distance in relation to the Earth and to the Sun indicates that it should have been gone long ago. The sun should have won this tug of war and pulled the Moon away, but somehow it hasn’t.
One of the peculiarities often publicly cited concerning the Moon is its same size in relation to the Sun as viewed from Earth. This effect is most noticeable during lunar eclipses.
“The chances of the Moon just happening to be in this position are too incredible to be credible.” ~ Isaac Asimov
“The disks of the Sun and Moon appear to be just about equal as viewed from the Earth. The Moon is 2160 miles in diameter. The sun is 864,000 miles in diameter. The ratio of the Moon’s disk to the Sun is 1:400. The Sun is 93 million miles from Earth while the Moon is about one quarter million miles out making it very close to the same ratio. “So the distance just about cancels out the size, and this is why the tiny Moon appears to the viewer on earth to be about the same size as our gigantic Sun.” (Wilson)
Walter Sullivan, former science editor for the New York Times “However, specialists in the movements of celestial bodies under the gravitational influence for one another— the science of celestial mechanics—found it hard to explain how the moon, if it came from afar and was captured by the Earth’s gravity, achieved so well behaved and circular an orbit.” (New York Times, November 16, 1969.)
“The moon would have to be 7 billion years old to account for an accumulation of argon-40…” The regolith is older than the rock samples found within it. (Walter Sullivan)
According the Harvard’s Sky and Telescope the Lunar Conference of 1973 revealed that a moon rock had been dated at 5.3 billion years old. Another report claimed that some of the rocks dated by Potassium Argon testing came up with an age of 7 billion years. This same journal refers to yet another study which asserts that “two Apollo XII rocks have been dated at 20 billion years of age.” Anyone of these ages is older than our star system if not the Milky Way galaxy itself strongly indicating that our Moon arrived here from another star system if not a distant galaxy. This of course all supports the Soviet spaceship theory.
The person single most responsible for introducing this lunar spaceship theory into contemporary public discussion was educator and author Donald K. Wilson through the publication of his two books Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon (1975) followed by Secrets of Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon (1979) which were initially met with for the most part public ridicule. The laughter has subsided greatly over the years since publication. Of course, those that ridicule these books do so based on ignorance and the title alone for there is essentially zero chance they read the books. When I had first gone through them in 1997, I had done so reluctantly and a bit out of desperation as I was running out of reading material in my area of interest. So, I held my nose and began reading.
It is not that all of this is hard to understand.
It is that it is hard to accept.
*Note- Attribution for major portions of this section are the product of selectively editing from multiple sources which should be given primarily to Author/Researchers Don Wilson, George Leonard, and references contained within their books and not to exclude numerous others.