The Reality Gap Part 5
“Instant Rock”
“The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth.” – Eric Blair, 1984
- J. B. Deutscher
- Far Northern California
As you will recall in Part 3 NASA knowingly promoted a fraudulent theory called Gravity Wasting as part of the cover-up for the discovery of Lunar Walkers. The most prominent example being an enormous fraud perpetrated on the public called Tracy’s Rock promoted by NASA, the USGS, and their point man, geologist Harrison Schmitt. NASA also relied on consulting geologists from various universities and institutions to toe the line, to ignore and falsify data to support their censorship and the lies they would feed the public.
One of the first things the consulting geologists contracting with NASA acting as principal investigators to review the Apollo 17 photography did was travel to White Sands proving grounds and study craters made by missile impacts and chemical explosions. They likely did this because many of the relatively small lunar craters at Taurus Littrow they would be studying had nothing to do with meteor impacts but were the result of weapons hits on structures, equipment, or crash impacts. NASA, its consultants (Or intelligence agency hacks) concocted an asinine theory to explain away the real condition. They called it regolith breccia or more colloquially “Instant Rock” which the ever gullible scientific community seemingly accepted without question. Shattered, partially melted pieces of mechanical debris and structures became “blocks of compacted soil.” After all, it was on the moon. Things are different up there. And, there was a whole crew of dishonest, servile, amoral, and criminal photo technicians at NASA Houston, Building 8 (and possibly other locations) altering and falsifying the photos under management’s directives to make sure nothing that would tip off the public ever got through; except, as you have already found out, things did get through.
The initial purported ‘meteor impact crater’ photo we will look at was taken during EVA 3 of Apollo 15 by astronaut Dave Scott at Geology Station 9 on August 2, 1971. The crater location is approximately 100 yards East of Hadley Rille. It is described as a minor crater near Scarp. There are many different processed versions of AS15-82-11097 all with somewhat different appearances. All have been heavily censored and inconsistent in quality of a 70mm Hasselblad photo but this earlier “HR’ version seems a bit less so. The view in the frame is somewhat limited but the floor of the crater, aside from the sizable amount of debris, appears of fairly uniform depth. The near/front and far/back sides trend parallel with the left end (allowing for sloughing) being perpendicular to the sides. The crater floor, the fill material, along with adjacent debris all point to a rectangular based surface structure destroyed by a weapon of some sort.
As examples, three items (A, B, & C) within the crater debris have been isolated and magnified clearly appearing as shattered fragments of mechanical or structural debris. D, the magnified image inset in the bottom forefront of the graphic is of special importance. It rests at the lower rim of the crater and does not appear as a fragment but as an intact object. End to end I would estimate it to be roughly 18 inches in length. It is clearly artificial. Don’t let the size dissuade you. I give it a high probability this is an abandoned spacecraft. Of note, when this image (D) was posted to the original LunarArcheology.org website in November of 2004 it was the only photo that was subsequently hacked and deleted from the website. It must have rubbed someone the wrong way.
Do these look like blocks of compacted soil like NASA says? Bear with me, NASA’s Instant Rock cover story gets even more preposterous when we go back to the Taurus Littrow Valley.
After finishing the three mini-pan photos of this minor crater ending with 11097, Apollo 15’s Dave Scott and Jim Irwin set up the gnomon as part of their photo documentation and sampling of something of interest at an area of the crater’s upper rim. (As seen in the 11098 comparison below)
The image on the left was represented as a direct scan of the original film from the NASA History website which will be the basis for the subsequent labeled image. Once I did a magnified examination of this frame I had requested a copy of the original 70mm positive film as part of my NSSDC order. Upon receiving that film it was digitally scanned into a 1200×1200 dpi image file as represented on the right.
The purported direct film scan downloaded from NASA History (upper left) does not have the “ink stamp” at the bottom center as has been noted in other purported direct film scans. The image on the right has the hand written frame number on the left side and if you look carefully you can see the film perforations to the left of that. (The perforations on the right side have been cropped out) These two elements should be present in every authentic 70 mm frame. However, the image does show that the film was sent to me intentionally processed overexposed and out of focus because no professional lab would every send out a product like that by mistake. My specific interest had been to resolve objects in the lower right hand of the frame. As was mentioned in Part 2, in a phone conversation the NSSDC guy handling image requests (In 2004) when pressed about discrepancies had said, “I get what they give me.” So maybe whoever they are saw what I had identified in the photo and censored it in a very crude fashion.
A labeled, marked image of 11098 derived from the medium resolution image from NASA History is shown below. It is one of a series of photographs documenting the weathered debris field of the minor crater’s rim.
The partially blue circled area labeled #1 identifies artificial debris as does #2 circled in yellow. #3 appears as equipment remnants. #4 upon magnification appears as a partially melted metallic object. Both #5s are equipment of some sort. The area within the partial circled red area labeled #6 upon magnification and lightening as well as being seen in subsequent frames appears as fragmented, partially melted, artificial debris.
The blue arrowed area is of high interest due to position between the two #5s; but in question. This object could be easily resolved with access to the authentic 70mm film.
The blue circled object with the red “?” appears as kind of an odd rock. It is visible in both previous and subsequent frames of the crater rim. Because it is in line between the camera and the gnomon it is likely of importance. And, it is also likely that the object’s appearance has been altered. Of note – a ‘rock’ of similar or almost the same appearance appears at a different location on a different mission. The blast debris seen here seems to have been subjected to high heat. (For scale the color flag on the gnomon leg is approximately 18 inches.)
11093 – This view of the crater rim taken just right of 11098 confirms concerns with regard to the authenticity of space imagery. Again we are comparing differences between earlier usually more accurate, medium resolution film scans with later purported High Resolution images derived from the very same unique photo number. The upper right details (outlined in red) demonstrate once again the obfuscation in the 70 mm imagery the public is shown as seen from left to right. The fine wiring or tubing within the red circle is rendered unrecognizable in the official right hand Hi-Res version.
In the lower left comparison, a trending rectangular piece of deteriorated debris is seen with the odd rock sitting on top the left hand side corner. The wiring or tubing can be seen connected to and continuing from the isolated area as seen in the upper red outlined detail. In the right Hi-Res detail the rectangular area is indiscernible. A blue circle in the lower corner (left) outlines clearly artificial debris while in the same area of the High-Res version (right) the objects disappear.
And if you think this must all be some kind of fluke or unique anomaly being seen in the regolith, think again. It is ubiquitous.The below graphic is based on a magnified area in 20694 at Taurus Littrow far from Hadley Rille. This was the single photo examined in Part 1. To better understand the lunar discoveries and space in general one must discard our earthly concepts of scale both large and small. The Apollo 17 ALSEP area for example is strewn with minor depressions in the one to four foot range that appear to contain fine structured deteriorated debris. Similar formations are seen in the surface photography in the other missions as well. The public is never shown accurate close-ups of any of these areas and likely for good reason.
Continuing back with Apollo 17 at Taurus Littrow we will go to Geology Station1, Steno to examine more of NASA’s Instant Rock.
The marked version of 20749 right is of the Southwest end of the 30 foot Geology Station 1 crater area. NASA describes the crater rim and adjacent surface area (foreground) as disturbed soil. The boulder with the yellow arrow was one of the two boulder sample locations and in this rare case may actually be a real boulder. The yellow oval area of the North Massif in the distance will be discussed later in more detail.
The left image 20751 shows the Station 1 Crater as viewed from the Southeast. What is described as disturbed soil is in the foreground. As examples, three specific areas or objects A, B, and C will be examined. The original photo was purposefully processed overexposed and out of focus to mask detail. The jpeg file has been darkened, contrasted, and sharpened to increase clarity.
Object A (Right) is seen in multiple Station 1 pan frames and is clearly artificial. Its appearance is consistent with a somewhat reflective manufactured metallic mechanism. The presence of this object alone is enough to render obsolete prevailing lunar dogma.
This entire view of the southeast side of the crater is laden with blast debris which through airbrushing combined with deceptive film processing has been subdued. There is a reason NASA described this area as disturbed soil.
Object B laying inches away from A is another artificial item lying atop the lunar regolith. For scale the astronaut boot print to the far right is approximately 14 inches long. Through darkening, contrasting and sharpening then magnifying the original image it can be clearly seen in many areas where it was censored. Leaving no doubt the immediate area around the crater is a concentrated debris field.
Object C Detail- on the Northeast end of the minor crater is equipment of some sort with a yellow arrow in the detail pointing toward a rectangular flat area within an outer casing. The blue arrow points to two vertical members projecting up from the panel. The red rectangular inset on the lower left highlights something in front of the panel which trends as a rectangular object that has possibly sustained damage.
The final Station 1` graphic (below) is a comparison of the Northeast crater rim area as seen in the Medium Resolution image versus the High Resolution version. The discrepancy is subtle at first glance. In the upper image can be seen a fairly linear, continuous wall of debris across and mostly above what should be the crater rim. In the later purported High Resolution image objects have been subdued and distorted. The shaded area has been heavily manipulated giving the crater rim a more natural rock and soil appearance. As an example the yellow oval area in both insets demonstrates the deception.
The next graphic (below) examines the dark area of the North Massif as seen in the background in 20751. (Upper right) The lower detail shows where the photo has been altered by knifing out the censored area and replacing it with substitute media blended in by airbrushing.
The following image specifically isolates how structures and objects present in the Taurus Littrow Valley were ‘airbrushed’ out is shown in the below graphic of a feature NASA has named Bear Mountain which is to the southeast of the landing site on the valley floor. In the earlier, more crudely censored crops of medium resolution frame 20706 and 20707 (inset) the presence of structures which have been intentionally obscured is clearly visible. Airbrush strokes are obvious in both images. There is particular blatant airbrushing of whatever is in the foreground. In the final product- 20356HR the censorship is complete. Bear Mountain has been given the appearance of a sand dune. Bear Mountain is no mountain at all but the remnants of a large structure. This is but one example of the manipulation which was applied to the entire valley setting. This same technique was used in falsifying what should have been a stunning view from the Apollo 15 landing site at Hadley Rille discussed later in this section.
The final Taurus Littrow images we will look at are based on 21801 which was part of pan of the Station 9 crater taken from the southeast end by Apollo 17 Astronaut Gene Cernan on December 13, 1972. I suspect that Geology Station 9 is a crash site. The blue arrow at the bottom center frame points to numerical ink stamp and along with the un-notated film present on the left edge confirms that the image is of a re-photograph of a printed photograph and certainly not the original film as represented by NASA. Extreme poor quality along with manipulation aside, three objects resting on the crater wall have been isolated, magnified, and inset within the original image.
- A – “Y” shaped object is almost certainly artificial debris.
- B – Appears as some kind of helmet and face piece with a damaged area on top of the helmet.
- C – Is the most interesting and appears as a humanoid skull sticking out and enveloped by some sort of intricate protective enclosure.
In the graphic left, by comparing crops from the earlier (now unavailable) photos with the later more heavily altered official versions, once again conclusively demonstrates the photographic fraud carried out by NASA/CIA.
As has been shown at Geology Station 2, (Nansen), Station 5, (Camelot) and at Station 6 (Tracey’s Rock) explorers Cernan and Schmitt were not alone. During their time at Station 9 (Van Serg) one frame (AS17-142-21791) again contains a diminutive non-US boot print just to the left and rear of the astronaut. Not only that; but something seemingly much stranger occurred while they were at Station 9. As Schmitt and Cernan carried out their tasks the remotely Houston controlled TV camera on the Rover picked up an anomalous object in the distance hovering to the southeast as seen in the video still inset within 22444 in the graphic below. When asked, Schmitt and Cernan are unaware of the object’s appearance.
CapCom then explains it away as “The Charge Flag” which looks nothing like the anomalous object shown in the upper portion of the 22444 graphic. Compare the two inset crops. There is no way that they are the same object.
The actual Charge Flag or Italian Flag’s location approximately 30 feet from the Rover is documented in the lower portion of the graphic as contained in AS-17-143-21837 which clearly shows the flag attached to the antenna connected to the EP Charge base. Further confirming that the anomalous object is in the far distance can be made by reviewing the video a17v.1684328 embedded below. The anomalous object only comes into focus as the camera pans way out as the hills about 4 miles in the distance come into focus. When the television camera pans back in closer to the Rover the object goes out of focus. At no time in the video is seen the charge antenna or the Seismic Charge 5 base although in footage of the Charge Flag deployment the antenna attached to the actual charge flag can be clearly seen as the antenna whips around.
The marked up Metric Mapping image (AS17-M-0794) (As shown below) is about as close as the public has been allowed to see of what is contained in the real lunar orbital imagery. The Metric Mapping Camera was located in the SIM bay of the Command and Service Module. The actual photo was taken from about 70 miles above the surface by Apollo 17 Astronaut, Ron Evens over the Taurus Littrow Valley region. This frame was part of my 2004 film order with the NSSDC. The film I received was a re-photograph of a blatantly altered/censored printed photograph. This was easily confirmed as at the bottom left of the film was an ink stamped classification or grading number only present on printed media among other obvious signs. In plain terms – I was defrauded.
What the public is shown looks nothing like the real image in definition and detail. The authentic image under magnification would just about be able to resolve the license plate numbers on a vehicle at that distance. By applying contrast, sharpening, and brightness to the purposefully ultra low quality digitized image downloaded from LPI circa 2005, obfuscation withstanding, a number of artificial features should become evident.
The Taurus Littrow Valley and Apollo 17 landing site is centered in the frame. Blue arrows point to remnants of artificial structures or suspected surface alterations. Note the South Massif red arrow pointing to a large rectangular shade area on the West side of the Massif. There appear to be similar irregularities suggesting artificiality to the North Massif area as well.
Of particular interest is the view of the East Massif in the lower center of the photo which includes multiple hallmarks of an artificial structure from the distinct right angle at the Northeast end to the semi-circular arced shape component rising from the center which faintly can be seen what maybe spokes connected to it. In George Leonard’s Somebody Else Is On The Moon he describes massive machinery present on the lunar surface including giant gears. (And Leonard’s attention was being directed to these oddities by a scientist inside NASA.) This may well be such an example being pointed out here. If so the supposed East Massif is actually the remnants of a 7 mile wide structure including a spoked wheel or gear sticking out being 3-4 miles in diameter. As has been stated previously the mountain sized ‘Massifs’ defining the Taurus Littrow Valley are actually colossal structures which date to a pre-Mare epoch of almost inconceivable antiquity. For further evaluation a color reversed version of the below image can be seen here.
The Apollo 15 landing site area is next. (As seen below)
The graphic is based on a printed photograph scan of a 70mm Hasselblad frame using a custom Zeiss 500mm telephoto lens from the orbiting Apollo 17 CSM. The image is not at all consistent in clarity with the equipment being used but is sufficient for the overall analysis. What is seen are the remnants of colossal surface structures. The process by which the degradation occurred will be discussed in later sections. Views in the Apollo 15 70mm surface photography from the Landing Site area are heavily doctored and do not correlate to the orbital view as seen in 21310. As a specific example the immense cubical structure as seen within the red circled area of the bottom crop in the graphic along with the adjacent structures in the ‘valley’ area should be a sight to behold. Instead the public is shown what look like sand dunes. When Ken Johnston said that the astronauts “Were in the Lunar Ruins” he was exactly correct. For his honesty NASA fired him.
The more accurate orbital view as opposed to the fraudulent official surface view is demonstrated in the graphic below. The red arrow in the lower right inset indicates photographer location and general camera direction.
The below graphic compares the earlier (2004 – NASA History Office) 21310 with the image presently represented by NASA Headquarters as 21310. Included in the graphic is an image of the appropriately lensed camera along with the actual film magazine used. Contrasting, darkening, and sharpening were applied to both images which were processed identically.
NASA’s latest iteration of 21310 is a complete a garbage quality image yet nobody seems to know or even be aware of the difference. Additionally, this new low in obfuscation and deceit has been now applied the entire 70mm photographic data set. The purported medium resolution less censored direct film scans which contain most of the revealing image details originally downloaded 2004-6 from NASA History Office are no longer available. Hence the opening quote for Part 5. –
“The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth.” – Eric Blair, 1984